banner

Spring 2023 (Volume 33, Number 1)

How to Manage Retroperitoneal Fibrosis?

By Vandana Ahluwalia, MD, FRCPC; Luke Y. Chen, MD, FRCPC, MMEd; and Mollie Carruthers, MD, FRCPC

Download PDF

Patient Case:
A 42-year-old man of Iranian descent presented originally with peri-umbilical discomfort. He had a computed tomography (CT) scan in Iran showing soft tissue attenuation surrounding the aorta from the infrarenal vessels to the common iliac bifurcation. This mass measured 5.7 cm x 3.0 cm x 5.9 cm. He received a course of prednisone empirically but, when he was completely weaned off steroids, his mass recurred. He underwent a CT-guided biopsy which showed chronic inflammation enriched with lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils, consistent with retroperitoneal fibrosis. He was restarted on prednisone and then placed on mycophenolate which he continued taking at presentation to us.

His labs in Canada showed normal kidney function, with a creatinine of 81 μmol/L (normal 60-155 μmol/L) and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 103 ml/min (normal is >59 ml/min). His complete blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes, and urinalysis were normal. His C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated at 19.1 mg/L (normal <3.1 mg/L). His total protein was elevated at 84 g/L (normal 62-80 g/L). His IgG4 level was normal at 0.719 gram/L (normal 0.052-1.25 g/L).

The patient was referred for recommendations on the diagnosis and management of his retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Introduction
Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) was first described by John Ormond, an American urologist in 1948.1 He described it as sclerotic tissue in the retroperitoneum, commonly peri-aortic or peri-iliac, and encasing adjacent structures. Common presenting symptoms include abdominal, back and/or flank pain along with constitutional symptoms.2 Patients may also present with acute renal failure due to ureteric obstruction, with retroperitoneal fibrosis found on abdominal/pelvis CT scanning. Peripheral edema may also be present due to compression of the iliac veins in the pelvis.3

RPF is a rare disease; for example, a Dutch study reported an incidence of 1.3/100,000.2 There is a male predominance, and the median age of onset is 64 years old.2 Patients were historically managed by urology with serial monitoring for hydronephrosis and serial ureteral stenting.3

A definition of RPF by Scheel et al. has been proposed that is not reliant on pathology. This includes: 1) identification by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a soft-tissue density surrounding the infrarenal or iliac vessels; 2) absence of aneurysmal dilation of the infrarenal aorta; 3) absence of an intra-abdominal or pelvic mass; 4) lack of suspicion of malignancy from history and physical examination; and 5) negative age-appropriate cancer screening.4 A radiographic-focused definition is important but does not precisely address the etiology of RPF, as management differs depending on the underlying cause. The pattern of aortic involvement, ureteric involvement, presence of lymph nodes or extension into the pelvic wall are not predictive radiographically of the underlying disease.5

What Are the Causes of RPF?
The pathogenesis of RPF is not known.6 However, when pathology is obtained from surgical or CT-guided biopsies, certain patterns emerge. Unfortunately, there have been no prospective analysis of biopsy results in retroperitoneal fibrosis. There is a high prevalence of both idiopathic and IgG4-related RPF in cases of RPF reported.5 In Khosroshahi’s study, any patients who carried a prior diagnosis of malignancy were excluded. This fits with the literature in which the association or causal relationship of RPF and malignancy is hard to quantify.6 It is safe to say that IgG4-related disease is the cause of RPF 30-57% of the time.6 Determining whether the patient has IgG4- related disease may represent one of the most important considerations, as it is a systemic disease that may progress over time.

There have been associations proposed between RPF and other conditions such as atherosclerosis, certain medications, and connective tissue disease.3 In cases where the tissue clearly shows one of these conditions, then one can make a case for causality. This occurs with lymphoma, for example, where the retroperitoneal soft tissue infiltration shows B-lymphocyte clonal proliferation.7 Similarly, when the adventitia of the aorta shows granulomatous infiltration and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies are positive, this is consistent with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.8 The list in Table 1 represents a more tailored differential diagnosis for RPF based on histopathologic evidence and expert opinion.

What Is the Appropriate Work-up of RPF?
Due to the high prevalence of IgG4-related disease with retroperitoneal fibrosis, a full clinical work up for systemic IgG4-related disease makes sense (Table 2). The systemic nature of IgG4-related disease makes pattern recognition difficult when making a clinical diagnosis. Similarly, the IgG subclasses are an unreliable biomarker for diagnosis, with a specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 60% in one single centre study.9 The typical pattern of IgG4-related disease has been defined in recent American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria.10 However, these classification criteria remain heavily reliant on histopathology and, therefore, most cases of IgG4-related disease require biopsy confirmation.11 IgG4-related RPF is defined by storiform fibrosis and enrichment of IgG4-positive plasma cells with a IgG4/IgG ratio of >40%. By contrast, idiopathic RPF shows lymphoid follicles, extensive non-storiform fibrosis and a low IgG4/IgG ratio. The idiopathic RPF patients also have no extraabdominal involvement.

In RPF, as in IgG4-related disease, a CT-guided or surgical biopsy is often necessary. If there is another organ site that is suggestive of IgG4-related disease, such as a submandibular gland, then the more easily accessed organ would be biopsied preferentially. Given the various causes of RPF listed in Table 1, management would be very different, depending on whether an immune-mediated condition, malignancy or infection is present.

The index patient was assessed in clinic for IgG4- related disease. He was asymptomatic at that time. His physical exam was notable for bilateral submandibular swelling. On CT scan of his neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis he was found to have bilateral submandibular gland enlargement, and bilateral mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. The RPF mass had decreased in size and now measured 5.1 cm x 2.7 cm x 5.2 cm. Figure 1 shows the characteristic axial view of RPF showing soft tissue encasement of the abdominal aorta at the level of the renal vessels. Histopathology slides of the retroperitoneal mass that he brought from Iran were reviewed at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. The pathology was found to be diagnostic of IgG4-related disease, notably with lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, storiform fibrosis and obliterative phlebitis with an IgG4/IgG ratio of >40%. This patient was diagnosed as having IgG4-related disease after this biopsy review.

Figure 1: Axial CT with contrast showing maximal 2.5 cm soft tissue thickening encasing the aorta indicated between 2 white arrows.

What is the Appropriate Management of IgG4-related RPF?
The proper treatment of IgG4-related disease is emerging. The mainstay of therapy is prednisone.12 Other options for IgG4-related disease include disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, of which mycophenolate is the most favoured.13,14 Rituximab has been observed to be effective in both IgG4-related disease and idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis.15,16,17 Ongoing studies are being done with respect to newer agents specifically for IgG4-related disease.

The index patient was refractory to both prednisone and mycophenolate. He was commenced on rituximab, but after one course of treatment, he was lost to follow up.

Vandana Ahluwalia, MD, FRCPC
Rheumatologist,
William Osler Health System
Brampton, Ontario

Luke Chen, MD, FRCPC, MMEd
Clinical Associate Professor of Hematology,
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia

Mollie Carruthers, MD, FRCPC
Rheumatologist and Clinical Investigator,
Arthritis Research Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia

References:

1. Ormond JK. Bilateral ureteral obstruction due to envelopment and compression by an inflammatory retroperitoneal process. J Urol. 1948; 59(6):1072-9.

2. Van Bommel EF, Jansen I, Hendriksz TR, et al. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: prospective evaluation of incidence and clinicoradiologic presentation. Medicine. 2009; 88(4):193-201.

3. Vaglio A, Salvarani C, Buzio C. Retroperitoneal fibrosis. Lancet. 2006; 367(9506):241-51.

4. Scheel PJ Jr, Feeley N. Retroperitoneal fibrosis: the clinical, laboratory, and radiographic presentation. Medicine. 2009; 88(4):202-7.

5. Khosroshahi A, Carruthers MN, Stone JH, et al. Rethinking Ormond's disease: "idiopathic" retroperitoneal fibrosis in the era of IgG4-related disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013; 92(2):82-91.

6. Rossi GM, Rocco R, Accorsi Buttini E, et al. Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis and its overlap with IgG4-related disease. Intern Emerg Med. 2017; 12(3):287-99.

7. Wan N, Jiao Y. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma mimics retroperitoneal fibrosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013.

8. Izzedine H, Servais A, Launay-Vacher V, et al. Retroperitoneal fibrosis due to Wegener's granulomatosis: a misdiagnosis as tuberculosis. Am J Med. 2020; 113(2):164-6.

9. Carruthers MN, Khosroshahi A, Augustin T, et al. The diagnostic utility of serum IgG4 concentrations in IgG4-related disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74(1):14-8.

10. Wallace ZS, Naden RP, Chari S, et al; Members of the ACR/EULAR IgG4-RD Classification Criteria Working Group. The 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for IgG4-related disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(1):77-87.

11. Chen LYC, Mattman A, Seidman MA, et al. IgG4-related disease: what a hematologist needs to know. Haematologica. 2019; 104(3):444-455.

12. Masaki Y, Matsui S, Saeki T, et al. A multicenter phase II prospective clinical trial of glucocorticoid for patients with untreated IgG4-related disease. Mod Rheumatol. 2017; 27(5):849-854.

13. Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, et al. Second International Symposium on IgG4-Related Disease. International Consensus Guidance Statement on the Management and Treatment of IgG4-Related Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67(7):1688-99.

14. Yunyun F, Yu P, Panpan Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of low dose mycophenolate mofetil treatment for immunoglobulin G4-related disease: a randomized clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019; 58(1):52-60.

15. Carruthers MN, Topazian MD, Khosroshahi A, et al. Rituximab for IgG4-related disease: a prospective, open-label trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74(6):1171-7.

16. Boyeva V, Alabsi H, Seidman MA, et al. Use of rituximab in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. BMC Rheumatol. 2020; 4:40.

17. Wallwork R, Wallace Z, Perugino C, et al. Rituximab for idiopathic and IgG4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(42):e12631.

Skyscraper

The access code to enter this site can be found on page 4 of the most recent issue of The Journal of the Canadian Rheumatology Association (CRAJ) or at the top of the most recent CRAJ email blast you received. Healthcare professionals can also obtain the access code by sending an email to CRAJwebmaster@sta.ca.

Remember Me